Blog

OpenSea was the NFT marketplace. Founded in 2017 by Devin Finzer and Alex Atallah, it became the dominant venue for buying and selling NFTs during the 2021-2022 boom. At its peak in January 2022, OpenSea processed over $5 billion in monthly trading volume and was valued at $13.3 billion — making it one of the most valuable crypto startups in history.

OpenSea’s dominance was built on first-mover advantage and network effects. It listed virtually every NFT collection on Ethereum, had the deepest liquidity, and was where both buyers and sellers naturally went. The platform charged a 2.5% fee on every transaction — a rate that seemed reasonable during a bull market when JPEGs were flipping for thousands of dollars but became painful as volumes declined.

The decline was steep. NFT trading volume crashed over 95% from peak by late 2023. Blur, launched by pseudonymous founder Pacman in October 2022, attacked OpenSea’s market share with zero trading fees, token incentives (the BLUR airdrop), and professional trading features like portfolio analysis and bid optimization. Blur explicitly targeted “power traders” who generated most volume, offering them a faster, cheaper, more professional platform. By 2023, Blur had surpassed OpenSea in trading volume.

OpenSea responded by cutting fees to zero (temporarily), launching OpenSea Pro (a Blur competitor), and eventually receiving an SEC Wells Notice in August 2024 — a warning of potential enforcement action that sent shockwaves through the NFT industry. The SEC’s position that NFTs could be securities threatened the entire marketplace model. OpenSea’s journey from $13.3 billion unicorn to potential SEC enforcement target in under three years illustrated how quickly fortunes change in crypto — and how regulatory risk can transform a market leader into a cautionary tale.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

In January 2023, developer Casey Rodarmor launched the Ordinals protocol, enabling NFT-like “inscriptions” directly on the Bitcoin blockchain. The concept was elegant: by assigning individual identity to each satoshi (the smallest unit of Bitcoin, 1/100,000,000 of a BTC), Rodarmor created a way to attach data — images, text, code, even video — to specific satoshis, making them unique digital artifacts stored permanently on Bitcoin’s blockchain.

The reaction split the Bitcoin community in half. Supporters argued that Ordinals brought new utility, users, and transaction fees to Bitcoin, demonstrating its versatility beyond simple value transfer. The increased transaction fees from inscription activity directly benefited miners — important for Bitcoin’s long-term security budget as block rewards diminish with each halving.

Critics — particularly Bitcoin maximalists who view Bitcoin as digital money and nothing else — were furious. They argued that inscriptions “spammed” Bitcoin’s limited block space, drove up transaction fees for regular users, and fundamentally misused the blockchain. The debate became ideological: should Bitcoin’s block space be reserved for financial transactions, or should it be available to anyone willing to pay the fee, regardless of purpose?

The market didn’t wait for the debate to resolve. Ordinals collections like NodeMonkes, Bitcoin Puppets, Quantum Cats, and Runestone attracted significant trading volume. The BRC-20 token standard (inspired by Ethereum’s ERC-20 but using Ordinals inscriptions) enabled fungible tokens on Bitcoin, spawning an entire memecoin ecosystem. Casey Rodarmor followed up with the “Runes” protocol in April 2024 (launched at the halving block), providing a more efficient standard for fungible tokens on Bitcoin. By 2024, Bitcoin had a growing ecosystem of NFTs, tokens, and DeFi — things that Bitcoin maximalists had spent years saying belonged on other chains. The civil war continues, but the block space market has spoken.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Creator royalties — automatic payments to original artists on every secondary sale — were one of the most celebrated features of NFTs. Unlike traditional art (where artists earn nothing when their work resells for millions at auction), NFTs could enforce royalties programmatically: typically 5-10% of every secondary sale sent back to the creator. This was hailed as a revolution in creator economics.

Then the market broke the promise. In late 2022, new marketplaces realized they could attract volume by making royalties optional or eliminating them entirely. Blur, the platform that eventually dethroned OpenSea, made royalties optional for traders. X2Y2 and SudoSwap also minimized royalties. Traders — who cared about maximizing profits, not supporting creators — gravitated toward platforms with lower costs. The market incentive was clear: the marketplace that charged less won more volume.

Creators were devastated. Yuga Labs (Bored Ape Yacht Club) earned tens of millions in royalties during the bull market. Smaller artists relied on royalties as their primary income stream. When royalties became optional, creator revenue collapsed even faster than trading volume. The community split bitterly: traders argued that forced royalties were anti-free-market; creators argued that royalty elimination was theft of the social contract that NFTs were built on.

Technical solutions emerged but with tradeoffs. ERC-721C (by Limit Break) allowed creators to restrict trading to royalty-enforcing marketplaces. OpenSea’s Operator Filter did similar. But these approaches fragmented liquidity — collections that enforced royalties couldn’t trade on the highest-volume marketplaces. By 2024, the market had largely settled on a grim equilibrium: royalties were effectively dead for most collections, with creators receiving 0-2.5% instead of the original 5-10%. The NFT royalty debate became a case study in how market forces can override social contracts, and how technical enforcement of norms is harder than it appears when users can always choose platforms that don’t enforce them.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Blur launched in October 2022 — the depths of the NFT bear market — and proceeded to dethrone OpenSea as the dominant NFT marketplace within months. Founded by pseudonymous developer “Pacman” (later revealed as Tieshun Roquerre), Blur succeeded by treating NFTs as financial assets to be traded, not art to be collected. The platform was designed for “pro traders”: zero marketplace fees, optional creator royalties, real-time portfolio analytics, and a bid-based system that rewarded active market-making.

The BLUR token airdrop strategy was masterful. Blur conducted multiple airdrop “seasons,” each rewarding different behaviors — listing NFTs, bidding on NFTs, and maintaining bids close to floor price. This created constant buying pressure and liquidity that self-reinforced: more liquidity attracted more traders, more traders created more volume, more volume justified higher BLUR rewards. At peak, Blur’s incentive system was effectively paying traders to trade NFTs.

Blur’s Blend protocol (launched May 2023) added perpetual lending for NFTs — users could borrow ETH against their NFTs without fixed terms or expiration. This was significant: it meant NFT holders could access liquidity without selling, and traders could leverage their positions. Blend quickly became the dominant NFT lending protocol, processing billions in cumulative loans.

The impact on the NFT ecosystem was profound and controversial. Blur accelerated the financialization of NFTs — treating them as tradeable assets rather than collectibles or art. Floor prices became more volatile as professional traders employed strategies imported from traditional finance. Creator royalties collapsed as Blur made them optional. The marketplace that “saved” NFT trading also arguably changed its character — from a community-driven collecting culture to a professional trading operation. Pacman launched Blast (an Ethereum Layer 2) in 2024, extending his influence from NFT marketplaces to blockchain infrastructure.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Pudgy Penguins — a collection of 8,888 cartoon penguin NFTs — has one of the most dramatic redemption arcs in crypto history. Launched in July 2021, the collection quickly gained popularity but was nearly destroyed by its original founders, who were accused of mismanaging funds, failing to deliver on promises, and driving the project into the ground. The floor price crashed from over 3 ETH to under 0.5 ETH.

In April 2022, Luca Netz — a young entrepreneur with experience in e-commerce and branding — purchased the Pudgy Penguins IP and smart contract for 750 ETH (roughly $2.5 million at the time). What followed was one of the most impressive business turnarounds in crypto. Netz treated Pudgy Penguins not as an NFT project but as an IP and brand company that happened to have blockchain-based ownership.

The strategy focused on physical products and mainstream brand building. Pudgy Penguins plush toys launched on Amazon and in Walmart stores — over 1 million physical toys sold by 2024. Each physical toy included a QR code linking to a digital experience, bridging physical and digital ownership. The brand expanded into licensing, social media content (Pudgy Penguins GIFs and stickers went viral on Giphy with billions of views), and children’s entertainment.

The results were extraordinary. The Pudgy Penguins floor price recovered from under 0.5 ETH to over 20 ETH by late 2024, making it one of the top 3 most valuable NFT collections. Netz launched the PENGU token on Solana in December 2024, airdropped to NFT holders and the broader community, creating additional value for the ecosystem. The Pudgy Penguins story proved that NFT projects could transcend their origins as speculative JPEGs and become genuine consumer brands — but it required treating the IP seriously, investing in real-world products, and building beyond the crypto-native audience.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

The music industry has a well-documented problem: artists receive a tiny fraction of the value they create. Spotify pays roughly $0.003-0.005 per stream — meaning an artist needs millions of streams to earn a living wage. Labels take 50-85% of recording revenue. Songwriters earn even less. Music NFTs promised to change this by letting artists sell directly to fans, cutting out intermediaries.

Several platforms emerged to facilitate music NFTs. Sound.xyz, founded by David Greenstein, created “listening parties” where artists dropped limited-edition song NFTs. Catalog provided a 1-of-1 marketplace for rare music. Royal, co-founded by 3LAU (Justin Blau), sold fractional streaming royalty ownership — fans could buy a percentage of a song’s future royalty income. Audius, a decentralized streaming platform, aimed to replace Spotify entirely with a blockchain-based alternative.

The early results were promising for artists who could cultivate an NFT-native fanbase. Daniel Allan, a bedroom producer, raised over $100,000 selling NFTs for an EP. Latasha, an independent artist, built a sustainable career through music NFT sales. RAC (André Allen Anjos) became one of the first Grammy winners to embrace crypto, selling music and experimenting with tokens. For artists with engaged crypto-native audiences, music NFTs provided income that streaming never could.

But music NFTs faced structural challenges. Most music fans don’t have crypto wallets. The collector base was tiny compared to the global music audience. And unlike visual art NFTs (which double as profile pictures and status symbols), music NFTs lacked clear display and social signaling value. By 2024, music NFTs remained a niche within a niche — powerful for artists who found their audience there, but far from replacing or even meaningfully supplementing the streaming economy for most musicians. The technology works; the distribution problem remains unsolved.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Art Blocks, founded by Erick Calderon (known as “Snowfro”) in November 2020, created the definitive platform for generative art on the blockchain. The concept: artists write algorithms that generate unique artworks at the moment of minting. The collector doesn’t choose which piece they get — the algorithm creates it on the fly using the transaction hash as a random seed. Each piece is unique, determined by code and chance.

The platform exploded in 2021. Tyler Hobbs’s “Fidenza” collection — 999 algorithmically generated compositions of curves and colors — became one of the most celebrated NFT collections ever, with pieces selling for millions. Dmitri Cherniak’s “Ringers” (1,000 pieces depicting pegs on a ring) sold for over $5 million for a single piece. Art Blocks Curated collections became status symbols in the NFT community, and the platform’s revenue reached hundreds of millions.

What made Art Blocks culturally significant was its legitimization of generative art as a serious artistic medium. Generative art has existed since the 1960s (Harold Cohen’s AARON program, Vera Molnár’s early computer works), but blockchain gave it provenance, scarcity, and a market. Art Blocks artists were exhibited at Christie’s, Sotheby’s, Art Basel, and major museums. Tyler Hobbs became one of the most commercially successful living artists in any medium.

The bear market hit Art Blocks hard — floor prices for many collections dropped 90%+ from peaks. But the platform’s cultural impact endures. It proved that NFTs could be vehicles for genuine artistic expression, not just cartoon profile pictures. The generative art movement spawned by Art Blocks — with artists like Hobbs, Cherniak, Jack Butcher (Checks), Matt DesLauriers, and hundreds of others — represents one of the most significant developments in digital art history. The code is the art, the blockchain is the gallery, and every mint is a performance.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android