Blog

Balancer, created by Fernando Martinelli and Mike McDonald, launched in March 2020 as a generalization of the automated market maker (AMM) concept. While Uniswap required 50/50 token pairs, Balancer allowed pools with up to 8 tokens in any ratio — 80/20, 60/20/20, or any custom weighting. This flexibility made Balancer not just a DEX but a programmable liquidity primitive.

The most important innovation was Balancer V2’s concept of a “vault” — a single smart contract that holds all pool liquidity, with separate “pool logic” contracts that define trading rules. This architecture was more gas-efficient and more flexible than having separate contracts for each pool. It also enabled “boosted pools” that automatically deposited idle liquidity into lending protocols like Aave, earning additional yield on assets waiting to be traded.

Balancer found its killer use case with Weighted Pools and the 80/20 concept: projects could create liquidity pools weighted 80% to their token and 20% to ETH (or another base asset). This meant LPs faced less impermanent loss compared to 50/50 pools while still providing trading liquidity. Several protocols — including Aura Finance (which optimized Balancer LP yields) and various DAOs — adopted Balancer pools for their treasury and liquidity management.

Balancer V3, in development through 2024, aimed to further simplify pool creation and improve capital efficiency. While Balancer never achieved Uniswap’s trading volume dominance, it carved out a valuable niche as the most flexible AMM in DeFi. Its veBAL governance model (inspired by Curve’s veCRV) created a meta-game where protocols competed for BAL emissions to direct liquidity to their pools — the “liquidity wars” that defined much of DeFi’s 2022-2023 competitive landscape.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

On March 13, 2023, Euler Finance — an Ethereum lending protocol holding over $200 million in TVL — was exploited for $197 million in one of the largest DeFi hacks ever. The attacker used a flash loan exploit targeting a vulnerability in Euler’s donation function, draining ETH, USDC, DAI, and wrapped staked ETH from the protocol. The crypto world watched in horror as another nine-figure hack played out in real time.

What happened next was unprecedented. Instead of the typical post-hack scenario — where funds are laundered through Tornado Cash and lost forever — the Euler team and community managed to negotiate the return of virtually all stolen funds. The process took three weeks of on-chain messages, negotiations, and implied threats.

The attacker initially sent 100 ETH to a Tornado Cash-linked address, suggesting they intended to launder the funds. But Euler’s team sent on-chain messages offering a 10% bounty ($19.7 million) for the funds’ return, while also noting they had engaged law enforcement and blockchain analytics firms. The community applied pressure: users who lost funds sent emotional messages to the attacker’s address.

Then something remarkable happened. The attacker began returning funds. In multiple transactions over several days, they returned approximately $197 million — keeping nothing. They even sent an on-chain apology message. The identity of the attacker was never publicly confirmed, though the negotiations suggested Euler’s team may have identified them privately, creating leverage for the return.

Euler’s recovery stands as one of the most extraordinary events in DeFi history. It demonstrated that on-chain negotiations can work, that social pressure matters even in pseudonymous systems, and that the transparency of blockchain — where stolen funds are visible to everyone — creates unique dynamics that traditional heists don’t face. Euler relaunched in 2024 with improved security, but its greatest legacy may be proving that not every hack needs to end in total loss.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Flash loans are one of DeFi’s most uniquely innovative — and uniquely dangerous — inventions. A flash loan lets you borrow any amount of money with zero collateral, as long as you return it within the same blockchain transaction. If you don’t return it, the entire transaction reverts as if it never happened. This sounds impossible, but it works because Ethereum transactions are atomic: everything in a transaction either happens or nothing does.

Aave introduced flash loans in January 2020, and they immediately became both a tool for legitimate arbitrage and a weapon for exploitation. The legitimate use case: a trader spots a price discrepancy between two DEXs, borrows millions via flash loan, executes the arbitrage, repays the loan, and keeps the profit — all in one transaction, with zero capital requirement. Flash loans democratized arbitrage, which previously required significant capital.

The exploitative use case proved far more impactful. Flash loans enabled a new category of attacks: borrow massive amounts, manipulate oracle prices or pool ratios, exploit the manipulated price for profit, repay the loan. The bZx protocol was flash loan attacked twice in February 2020 for $1 million. Harvest Finance lost $34 million in October 2020. Pancake Bunny lost $45 million in May 2021. The list grew longer every month.

The flash loan attack pattern became so common that “flash loan attack” entered the crypto lexicon alongside “rug pull” and “51% attack.” Protocols responded by implementing time-weighted average prices (TWAPs) instead of spot prices for oracles, adding flash loan guards, and using Chainlink price feeds that can’t be manipulated within a single transaction. By 2024, flash loan attacks had become less common — not because flash loans changed, but because protocols learned to defend against them. Flash loans remain a powerful primitive: they prove that in DeFi, capital is not a prerequisite for financial operations, which is both revolutionary and terrifying.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

The “Curve Wars” was one of the most fascinating competitive dynamics in DeFi history — a multi-protocol battle for control over Curve Finance’s CRV token emissions, worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually. At the center of this battle was Convex Finance, a protocol that accumulated massive voting power over Curve and became one of DeFi’s most important but least understood players.

To understand the Curve Wars, start with Curve Finance. Curve’s veCRV (vote-escrowed CRV) system allowed CRV holders who locked their tokens for up to 4 years to vote on which liquidity pools received CRV rewards. Pools that received more CRV rewards attracted more liquidity. More liquidity meant better prices for traders using those pools. For stablecoin issuers and protocols that needed deep liquidity, directing CRV emissions to their pools was worth millions.

Convex Finance, launched in May 2021, created a clever mechanism: users deposited CRV into Convex and received cvxCRV, earning boosted yields. Convex accumulated so much veCRV that it controlled over 50% of Curve’s voting power. The CVX token (Convex’s governance token) became the “kingmaker” — whoever controlled CVX controlled where Curve’s emissions went.

This created a secondary market: protocols began “bribing” CVX holders to vote for their pools. Platforms like Votium facilitated these bribes (rebranded as “incentives”). At peak, protocols were paying $1.50-$2.00 per $1 of CRV emissions — seemingly irrational unless you understood that the liquidity those emissions attracted was worth far more than the bribe cost. The Curve Wars demonstrated that in DeFi, governance power is economic power, and the most valuable protocols might not be the ones users interact with directly but the ones that control resource allocation across the ecosystem.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Pendle Finance introduced a concept from traditional finance to DeFi: yield tokenization. The protocol splits yield-bearing tokens into two components — principal tokens (PT) and yield tokens (YT) — allowing users to trade future yield separately from the underlying asset. If you hold staked ETH earning 4% APR, Pendle lets you sell that future yield to someone else for cash today, or buy discounted future yield if you think rates will increase.

Founded by TN Lee and launched on Ethereum in 2021, Pendle initially gained modest traction. Its breakout moment came in 2023-2024 when the rise of liquid staking tokens (stETH, rETH) and restaking (EigenLayer points) created enormous demand for yield trading. Users could deposit EigenLayer-associated tokens into Pendle, separate the points exposure (YT) from the principal (PT), and either sell the points exposure for immediate profit or buy it speculatively.

The EigenLayer points trade was Pendle’s killer app. Because EigenLayer hadn’t distributed its token yet, the YT tokens on Pendle became the primary market for pricing EigenLayer points. Traders who believed the EIGEN airdrop would be valuable bought YT; those who wanted to lock in guaranteed returns sold YT and held PT (which represented the principal plus a fixed yield at maturity). Pendle’s TVL exploded from under $200 million to over $6 billion in early 2024.

Pendle expanded to Arbitrum and multiple chains, becoming the dominant venue for yield trading in DeFi. The protocol’s AMM was specifically designed for yield tokens (which decay in value as they approach maturity, unlike regular tokens), representing genuine financial engineering rather than simple token cloning. Pendle proved that DeFi could import sophisticated fixed-income concepts from traditional finance and make them accessible to anyone with a wallet.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Yearn Finance was created by Andre Cronje in early 2020 as a personal tool to optimize his own DeFi yields. When he open-sourced it, the protocol became one of the defining projects of “DeFi Summer” — the explosive growth period in mid-2020 when billions flooded into Ethereum-based financial protocols. Yearn’s YFI token, launched with zero pre-mine and distributed entirely to liquidity providers, became a symbol of “fair launch” idealism.

The concept was elegant: deposit tokens into Yearn “vaults,” and automated strategies would move those funds between lending protocols, liquidity pools, and yield farms to maximize returns. Users didn’t need to manually move funds between Aave, Compound, and Curve — Yearn did it automatically, charging a performance fee. At its peak, Yearn held over $6 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL).

Andre Cronje became DeFi’s most prolific builder, launching multiple protocols (Fantom involvement, Solidly, Keep3r Network) at breakneck speed. His approach — “test in prod” (deploying contracts to mainnet with minimal auditing) — was both celebrated for its speed and criticized for its recklessness. Cronje famously “quit DeFi” multiple times, including a dramatic March 2022 departure that crashed prices of his associated tokens.

By 2024, Yearn had evolved significantly under the leadership of contributors like tracheopteryx and the broader DAO. The protocol remained operational with around $400 million in TVL — a fraction of its peak but still substantial. Yearn’s legacy extends beyond its own protocol: the yield aggregator model it pioneered was copied by dozens of projects across every chain, and the “fair launch” distribution of YFI inspired a generation of tokenomics designs. Yearn proved that DeFi could create genuinely useful financial automation — and that personality-driven crypto projects carry unique risks when the personality decides to leave.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

Compound, founded by Robert Leshner in 2017, didn’t invent DeFi lending — but it invented the incentive mechanism that made DeFi lending explode. In June 2020, Compound launched its COMP governance token and distributed it to users who supplied or borrowed assets on the protocol. This “liquidity mining” innovation — paying users tokens for using the protocol — triggered DeFi Summer and became the template for the entire DeFi industry.

The mechanism was brilliantly self-reinforcing: users earned COMP tokens for lending and borrowing, COMP had market value, so the effective yield on deposits skyrocketed. This attracted more deposits, which attracted more borrowers, which generated more fees, which justified higher COMP prices. At its peak, Compound held over $10 billion in TVL and COMP traded above $900.

Compound’s governance model — one of the first truly functional on-chain governance systems — allowed COMP holders to propose and vote on protocol changes. This was pioneering but not without drama. In September 2021, a governance proposal accidentally sent $80 million in COMP tokens to the wrong addresses. Leshner initially tweeted asking recipients to return the funds, threatening to report them to the IRS — a response widely mocked as antithetical to DeFi’s permissionless ethos. The funds were eventually mostly returned.

By 2024, Compound had ceded its dominant position to Aave, which offered more assets, more chains, and more features. Compound III (launched 2022) simplified the protocol architecture but didn’t recapture market share. Compound’s legacy is secure regardless: it invented the token incentive model that bootstrapped the entire DeFi ecosystem. Nearly every DeFi protocol that followed — from SushiSwap’s vampire attack on Uniswap to Blur’s points system — traces its incentive design lineage back to Compound’s COMP distribution.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

1inch Network was born at ETHGlobal New York 2019 hackathon, created by Sergej Kunz and Anton Bukov. The project solved a real problem: with dozens of DEXs offering different prices for the same token swap, how do you ensure you’re getting the best deal? 1inch aggregates prices across multiple DEXs and routes trades through the optimal path — sometimes splitting a single trade across multiple exchanges to minimize slippage and maximize returns.

The aggregator model proved enormously valuable. Instead of a user manually checking Uniswap, SushiSwap, Balancer, and Curve for the best ETH/USDC price, 1inch checks them all (and dozens more) in milliseconds and routes the trade for optimal execution. For large trades, the difference can be significant — 1inch’s routing engine might split a $100,000 swap across three DEXs to reduce price impact.

1inch expanded beyond aggregation into its own products: Limit Order Protocol (offering limit orders on DEXs, which typically only support market orders), 1inch Fusion (an intent-based trading system where professional market makers called “resolvers” compete to fill user orders at the best price), and deployment across 12+ chains. The 1INCH token launched via an airdrop in December 2020, rewarding early users of the platform.

By 2024, 1inch processed billions in monthly trading volume, making it one of the most-used DeFi applications. The aggregator category expanded to include competitors like Paraswap, OpenOcean, and KyberSwap, but 1inch maintained its position as the category leader. The fundamental insight — that fragmented liquidity across DEXs creates an aggregation opportunity — only grows more valuable as the number of chains and DEXs multiplies. Every new chain with new DEXs is another venue for 1inch to find better prices.

Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android