Memeshot Blog

Blog

  • The Memecoin Supercycle: A New Crypto Paradigm or Peak Speculation?

    The “memecoin supercycle” thesis — that memecoins represent a permanent shift in how crypto markets work, not just a temporary mania — gained traction throughout 2024 as memecoin trading volumes, market caps, and cultural influence reached unprecedented levels. Proponents argued that crypto was always about narratives and communities, and memecoins are simply the purest expression of this truth.

    The evidence was compelling. Combined memecoin market cap exceeded $50 billion in 2024. Dogecoin ($20B+), Shiba Inu ($10B+), PEPE ($5B+), WIF ($4B+), BONK ($2B+), and FLOKI ($2B+) were all firmly established assets with deep liquidity and active communities. New memecoins launched daily on Solana through Pump.fun, with some reaching hundreds of millions in market cap within hours of launch. The activity generated more transaction fees on Solana than DeFi, NFTs, or any other category.

    The thesis argues memecoins are the “equity” of internet culture. Just as companies capture economic value through stock, memecoins capture cultural value through tokens. A viral meme (PEPE), a cultural moment (political tokens), or a community identity (BONK for Solana) creates genuine social value that memecoins monetize. The barrier to creating a memecoin is essentially zero (Pump.fun proved this), which means the market is highly efficient at creating tokens for every cultural moment — and equally efficient at destroying value when attention moves elsewhere.

    Critics counter that the supercycle thesis rationalizes gambling. Most memecoin buyers lose money — the distribution is extremely skewed toward early buyers and insiders. The 95%+ failure rate of new memecoins means the average expected return is deeply negative. Memecoins produce no revenue, serve no utility, and create no economic value beyond speculation. The supercycle might simply be the latest iteration of crypto’s recurring pattern of rationalizing speculation as innovation. Whether memecoins represent a permanent market structure or a cyclical excess that will correct remains the most debated question in 2024-era crypto.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Crypto Venture Capital: How a16z, Paradigm, and Others Shaped the Industry

    Crypto venture capital transformed from a niche activity in 2017 into a $30+ billion annual industry by 2021-2022, with firms like Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Paradigm, Polychain Capital, and Multicoin Capital becoming some of the most influential actors in the crypto ecosystem. Their investment decisions shape which protocols get built, which narratives gain traction, and how the industry evolves.

    a16z (Andreessen Horowitz) is the most influential crypto VC, having raised over $7 billion across multiple crypto-dedicated funds. Led by crypto partners Chris Dixon and (formerly) Katie Haun, a16z backed many of the biggest crypto projects: Coinbase, Solana, Uniswap, MakerDAO, Compound, Optimism, and dozens of others. The firm’s investment thesis — that crypto enables “read-write-own” internet applications where users own their data and digital assets — shaped the “Web3” narrative that dominated 2021-2022.

    Paradigm, founded by Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam and former Sequoia partner Matt Huang, took a more technically focused approach. Paradigm’s research team published influential papers on MEV, AMM design, and protocol mechanism design. The firm’s $2.5 billion fund (raised in 2021) was the largest ever crypto fund at the time. Paradigm’s investments included Uniswap, dYdX, Blur, Cosmos, and Optimism.

    The 2022-2023 bear market hit crypto VC hard. Several firms suffered massive losses on investments in FTX, Terra, and other failed projects. Fundraising dropped dramatically — from $30+ billion in 2021 to under $10 billion in 2023. But crypto VC proved resilient, with investment recovering in 2024 as markets improved. The industry’s influence remains enormous: VC-backed projects receive not just capital but token listing support, marketing, developer network access, and narrative amplification that can determine a project’s success or failure.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Filecoin: The Decentralized Storage Network

    Filecoin, created by Juan Benet (who also created IPFS — the InterPlanetary File System), launched in October 2020 as a decentralized storage marketplace. The concept: instead of storing data on Amazon S3 or Google Cloud, users pay storage providers (miners) in FIL tokens to store files across a distributed network. Storage providers earn FIL by proving they’re reliably storing data over time.

    The protocol uses two novel consensus mechanisms: Proof of Replication (proving that a unique copy of data has been stored) and Proof of Spacetime (proving that data continues to be stored over time). These mechanisms ensure that storage providers actually store the data they claim to — a fundamental challenge for decentralized storage that naive approaches (simply trusting providers) can’t solve.

    Filecoin’s network grew to store enormous amounts of data — over 22 EiB (exbibytes) of storage capacity by 2024. However, a significant portion of this was “junk data” stored by providers to earn mining rewards rather than genuine customer data. The “useful storage” problem — incentivizing storage of actually demanded data rather than self-generated data to mine rewards — remained a persistent challenge.

    Filecoin Virtual Machine (FVM), launched in 2023, brought smart contract capability to Filecoin, enabling DeFi and applications on top of the storage network. This expanded Filecoin from a pure storage protocol to a general-purpose blockchain with storage as its unique value proposition. The FIL token, while down significantly from its all-time high, maintained a multi-billion dollar market cap. Filecoin competes with Arweave (permanent storage), Sia, and Storj in the decentralized storage space, but its backing from Protocol Labs, ICO funding ($257 million in 2017), and IPFS integration give it the largest ecosystem and most storage capacity.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • friend.tech: The SocialFi Experiment That Made (and Lost) Millions

    friend.tech, launched on Base in August 2023, created one of the most viral crypto applications of the year by financializing social relationships. The concept: every user has “keys” (originally “shares”) that others can buy and sell. As more people buy your keys, the price increases along a bonding curve. Holding someone’s keys grants access to their private chat. The result: a market for social access where popular crypto personalities’ keys traded for thousands of dollars.

    The initial viral growth was explosive. Within weeks, friend.tech generated tens of millions in protocol revenue (taking a 5% fee on every key trade). Crypto Twitter influencers, traders, and builders rushed to create accounts, as early movers could profit from key appreciation. The platform generated more revenue than many established DeFi protocols in its first month.

    But the model proved unsustainable. Key prices for most users crashed as the novelty wore off and new buyers stopped joining. The bonding curve mathematics meant that later buyers paid dramatically more than early buyers, and any significant selling pressure caused prices to collapse — a dynamic that felt uncomfortably like a Ponzi scheme. The “utility” (access to a private chat) was rarely valuable enough to justify key prices.

    friend.tech launched a V2 with a native token (FRIEND), but the launch was poorly received and the token crashed. By late 2024, the platform had largely faded from relevance. The creator eventually abandoned the project. friend.tech’s legacy is as a cautionary tale about SocialFi — the intersection of social media and finance. While the concept of tokenized social relationships has theoretical appeal, friend.tech proved that pure financialization of social connections creates speculation, not community, and that the bonding curve model enriches early participants at the expense of later ones.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Aave: The DeFi Lending Protocol That Became a Bank

    Aave, created by Stani Kulechov and originally named ETHLend, evolved from a simple peer-to-peer lending dApp into the largest decentralized lending protocol in crypto, with over $20 billion in TVL by 2024. The protocol allows users to deposit crypto assets as collateral and borrow against them — or supply assets to earn yield from borrowers’ interest payments. It is, in essence, a bank that operates as a smart contract.

    Aave pioneered multiple DeFi innovations: flash loans (uncollateralized loans that must be repaid within a single transaction), rate switching (toggle between stable and variable interest rates), credit delegation (letting trusted parties borrow against your collateral), and isolation mode (limiting exposure to riskier assets). Aave V3 (launched 2023) added cross-chain liquidity through “portals” and improved capital efficiency.

    The protocol expanded across every major chain — Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Base, and others — making it the most multi-chain DeFi protocol. GHO, Aave’s own stablecoin launched in 2023, aimed to capture stablecoin revenue for the protocol. Aave’s governance (through the AAVE token) has been one of the more active DAO governance systems, with regular proposals on risk parameters, new asset listings, and protocol upgrades.

    Aave’s importance to DeFi cannot be overstated. It’s where whales park their crypto to earn yield, where traders borrow to leverage positions, and where the largest onchain lending market operates. When Aave’s interest rates move, it affects capital allocation across the entire DeFi ecosystem. The protocol generating hundreds of millions in annual revenue while operating as permissionless smart contracts — no office, no employees in the traditional sense, no CEO making lending decisions — remains one of DeFi’s most profound achievements.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Terra/Luna: The $60 Billion Collapse That Shook Crypto to Its Core

    The collapse of Terra/Luna in May 2022 was the most catastrophic event in crypto since Mt. Gox — a $60+ billion destruction of value that triggered cascading failures across the industry and forever changed how the market views algorithmic stablecoins. The story of Terra is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unsustainable yields, algorithmic hubris, and the speed at which crypto confidence can evaporate.

    Terra’s mechanism: the UST stablecoin maintained its dollar peg through an algorithmic relationship with LUNA. When UST traded above $1, users could burn $1 of LUNA to mint 1 UST (increasing UST supply, pushing price down). When UST traded below $1, users could burn 1 UST to receive $1 of LUNA (decreasing UST supply, pushing price up). The system worked as long as there was demand for UST and confidence in the mechanism.

    Anchor Protocol provided that demand: it offered 19.5% APY on UST deposits — an unsustainable yield funded by protocol reserves and LUNA emissions rather than real lending activity. Anchor attracted over $14 billion in deposits from users chasing the high yield, many of whom didn’t understand the risk. Do Kwon, Terra’s charismatic and combative founder, dismissed critics who called the yield unsustainable, famously telling doubters to “enjoy being poor.”

    The death spiral began on May 7, 2022, when large UST sales on Curve Finance depegged UST to $0.98. The mint/burn mechanism kicked in: UST holders burned UST for LUNA, massively increasing LUNA supply. As LUNA’s price crashed from the dilution, confidence in the system collapsed. More UST holders rushed to exit, burning more UST for increasingly worthless LUNA. Within five days, UST went from $1 to $0.10, and LUNA went from $80 to fractions of a penny. $60+ billion in combined value vanished.

    The cascading effects were devastating. Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which had massive LUNA and UST positions, went bankrupt — and its bankruptcy triggered the falls of Voyager Digital, Celsius Network, and Genesis Trading, as 3AC’s unpaid loans cascaded through the system. The human cost was severe: suicides were reported in South Korea, where retail investment in UST was widespread. Do Kwon became an international fugitive, eventually arrested in Montenegro in March 2023 with fake passports. He was extradited to the US in December 2024 to face fraud charges. Terra’s collapse permanently discredited purely algorithmic stablecoins and injected healthy skepticism about any protocol offering yields that seem too good to be true.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried: The $32 Billion Fraud That Changed Crypto Forever

    The collapse of FTX in November 2022 was crypto’s Enron moment — a multi-billion dollar fraud perpetrated by one of the industry’s most prominent figures that destroyed customer funds, triggered an industry-wide crisis of confidence, and led to the conviction and imprisonment of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). The story reads like a financial thriller that became too absurd for fiction.

    FTX, founded by SBF and Gary Wang in 2019, grew into the third-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally, with a peak valuation of $32 billion. SBF became the public face of crypto: testifying before Congress, donating millions to political campaigns, appearing on magazine covers, and cultivating an image as an altruistic effective-altruist using crypto to do good. He was, by appearances, the adult in the room that crypto needed.

    The reality was fraud. FTX had been secretly transferring billions in customer deposits to Alameda Research, SBF’s trading firm, which used the funds for risky trades, venture investments, real estate purchases, and political donations. When CoinDesk published a November 2, 2022 article revealing that Alameda’s balance sheet was primarily composed of FTT (FTX’s own token), Binance CEO CZ announced he would sell Binance’s FTT holdings. The announcement triggered a bank run — customers rushed to withdraw funds, and FTX couldn’t honor the withdrawals because the money wasn’t there.

    FTX filed for bankruptcy on November 11, 2022. An estimated $8+ billion in customer funds was missing. The subsequent investigation revealed jaw-dropping details: no accounting controls, customer deposits commingled with company funds, a $7 billion hole disguised by a backdoor in FTX’s software, and executive compensation including $300 million spent on Bahamas real estate. SBF was arrested in December 2022, tried in October-November 2023, convicted on all seven criminal counts (including wire fraud and money laundering), and sentenced to 25 years in prison in March 2024.

    The FTX collapse’s impact on the industry was transformative. It triggered demands for proof-of-reserves from all major exchanges. It accelerated regulatory action globally. It destroyed the “effective altruism” narrative in crypto. And it taught the most painful lesson: in crypto, where “don’t trust, verify” is a founding principle, the industry trusted a charismatic founder with billions in customer funds — and paid the price. FTX’s bankruptcy estate, under CEO John J. Ray III, recovered substantial assets and announced plans to repay customers at their November 2022 balances (not current crypto prices), sparking further controversy about recovery fairness.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Jito: Solana’s MEV Infrastructure and the Controversial Airdrop

    Jito Labs built MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) infrastructure for Solana, becoming one of the most important but invisible protocols in the ecosystem. The Jito-Solana validator client — a modified version of Solana’s validator software — enables block space auctions, tip distribution, and MEV extraction in an orderly manner. By 2024, over 80% of Solana validators ran Jito’s modified client, making it de facto critical infrastructure.

    JitoSOL, the protocol’s liquid staking token, became one of the largest on Solana. Users stake SOL through Jito and receive JitoSOL, which earns staking rewards plus MEV tips — a higher yield than standard Solana staking. The MEV component is key: validators running Jito’s client earn additional tips from searchers who want their transactions prioritized, and these tips are shared with JitoSOL holders.

    The JTO token airdrop in December 2023 was enormously lucrative and highly controversial. Jito distributed tokens to users who held JitoSOL, with many recipients receiving $10,000-$50,000+ worth of JTO. However, the airdrop came under fire for its distribution: a significant portion went to a small number of large holders, and some accused Jito of favoring insider-connected wallets. Despite the controversy, JTO quickly achieved a multi-billion dollar market cap.

    Jito’s position in Solana’s ecosystem raises important questions about MEV on high-throughput chains. Solana’s architecture (continuous block production, parallel transaction processing) creates different MEV dynamics than Ethereum’s discrete-block model. Jito essentially created an organized MEV market on Solana — bringing both the efficiency benefits (orderly extraction reduces spam and failed transactions) and the fairness concerns (sophisticated MEV extractors profit at regular users’ expense) that MEV creates on every chain.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Uniswap V4 and Hooks: The DEX That Keeps Reinventing Itself

    Uniswap — the most important decentralized exchange, responsible for pioneering the AMM (Automated Market Maker) model — has continually reinvented itself through successive versions. V1 (2018) proved AMMs worked. V2 (2020) added any ERC-20 pair. V3 (2021) introduced concentrated liquidity, revolutionizing capital efficiency. V4, announced in June 2023, introduces “hooks” — custom smart contracts that can modify pool behavior at every stage of a trade’s lifecycle.

    Hooks transform Uniswap from a fixed-functionality DEX into a platform for building custom trading logic. A hook can execute code before or after swaps, when liquidity is added or removed, or when positions are created or destroyed. This enables: dynamic fees that change based on volatility, onchain limit orders, time-weighted average market making, custom oracle integrations, KYC-gated pools (for compliance-requiring institutions), automatic rebalancing strategies, and countless other innovations that developers can create.

    The Uniswap Foundation (separate from Uniswap Labs) manages the UNI governance token and protocol development. UNI governance has debated “fee switch” — directing a portion of trading fees to UNI token holders rather than only to liquidity providers. The fee switch debate encapsulates a fundamental DeFi governance question: should protocols prioritize growth (keeping fees low and directed to LPs) or token holder returns (extracting fees for governance token holders)?

    Uniswap’s dominance is remarkable: across all chains where it’s deployed (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Base, BNB Chain, and more), Uniswap consistently handles more trading volume than any other DEX. The protocol has facilitated over $2 trillion in cumulative trading volume since launch. V4’s hooks architecture — making Uniswap a platform rather than just an exchange — positions it to remain the dominant DEX even as the competitive landscape evolves. The UNI token’s market cap of $5+ billion reflects confidence that Uniswap will continue to capture value from the growing onchain trading economy.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android

  • Lido: The Liquid Staking Giant That Controls a Third of Staked ETH

    Lido is the largest liquid staking protocol in crypto and one of the most systemically important protocols in the Ethereum ecosystem. By 2024, Lido held over $30 billion in staked ETH — approximately one-third of all staked ETH — making it the largest single entity in Ethereum’s proof-of-stake validator set. This dominance is both Lido’s greatest strength and its most concerning characteristic.

    The product is elegant: deposit ETH into Lido, receive stETH (staked ETH), which earns staking rewards (~3-4% APY) while remaining liquid and usable in DeFi. Before Lido, staking ETH required locking 32 ETH and running a validator node — inaccessible to most holders. Lido enabled staking with any amount of ETH and maintained liquidity through the stETH token. stETH became one of the most important tokens in DeFi — used as collateral on Aave and MakerDAO, as a base pair on DEXs, and as the primary input for EigenLayer restaking.

    The governance structure uses the LDO token, with Lido DAO managing protocol parameters, node operator selection, and treasury allocation. The protocol distributes staking rewards primarily to stakers (90%), with node operators (5%) and the Lido treasury (5%) receiving smaller shares.

    The centralization concern is serious. Ethereum’s security depends on no single entity controlling too much of the validator set — a 33% share could theoretically enable certain attacks on consensus. Lido’s approach to this concern involved expanding its node operator set (from an initial handful to dozens of operators across different geographies and organizations) and implementing distributed validator technology (DVT) to further distribute validation responsibilities. Vitalik Buterin and others have advocated for self-limiting staking protocols (capping at a percentage of total stake), but Lido’s governance has been reluctant to impose limits that would sacrifice market share. The tension between Lido’s growth and Ethereum’s decentralization remains unresolved — a structural challenge inherent in liquid staking’s winner-take-most dynamics.

    Trade memecoins safely on Memeshot — iOS / Android