Snapshot launched in 2020 as a free, offchain voting platform for DAOs. The problem it solved was simple but critical: onchain voting on Ethereum was expensive. Each vote cost gas, which meant that governance participation had a financial cost — $5-50 per vote depending on network congestion. This priced out most token holders and made governance a privilege of whales. Snapshot eliminated the cost by moving votes offchain while still using onchain token balances to determine voting power.
The adoption was immediate and near-universal. By 2024, Snapshot hosted governance for over 20,000 DAOs and had processed millions of proposals and votes. Virtually every major DeFi protocol used Snapshot for at least some of its governance — Uniswap, Aave, ENS, Compound, Lido, and hundreds of others. The platform became so dominant that “putting it on Snapshot” became shorthand for “starting a governance process.”
Snapshot’s design was deliberately minimal. Users created “spaces” for their DAOs, defined voting strategies (token-weighted, quadratic, etc.), and published proposals. Token holders signed messages (free, no gas) to cast votes. The results were transparent and verifiable but not automatically executed onchain — a multisig or governance contract still needed to implement winning proposals. This “signal voting” approach was less trustless than fully onchain governance but orders of magnitude more accessible.
The platform revealed a consistent pattern: DAO governance participation is low regardless of cost. Even with free voting, most DAOs see less than 5% of token holders voting on any given proposal. The barrier isn’t financial — it’s informational and motivational. Most token holders don’t have the context to evaluate complex protocol proposals, and the incentive to invest time in governance is weak when individual votes rarely matter. Snapshot solved the cost problem perfectly. The engagement problem remains unsolved.
Leave a Reply